Codebase assessment
Before anything, we read the generated code and tell you, in writing, what is salvageable, what has to be rebuilt, and what it will take. No obligation to continue.
You shipped fast with FlutterFlow, an AI builder, or a vibe-coded prototype and got a working demo - that part did its job. The wall comes later: the tenth feature fights the last one, no developer wants to inherit the generated code, and you can't leave the platform you built on. We rebuild it as Flutter your team owns and extends - same product, real architecture underneath, no rewrite from zero.
Before anything, we read the generated code and tell you, in writing, what is salvageable, what has to be rebuilt, and what it will take. No obligation to continue.
We rebuild the app as production Flutter your team can read, test, and own - same screens and flows, a real architecture underneath instead of generated glue.
The generator skipped the parts that keep an app stable. We add the tests, CI, and typing, so a change in one screen stops silently breaking three others.
We rebuild behind the running app, screen by screen, so you keep shipping to users while the foundation gets replaced - no big-bang rewrite, no freeze.
When it ships, the code is yours: documented, conventional Flutter your team can maintain and extend. No platform lock-in, nothing gated behind us.
We read the generated codebase and report, in writing, what is salvageable, what has to be rebuilt, and what it will take.
We agree what to keep and what to rebuild, and in what order - so the app keeps working for users the whole way through.
We rebuild it on a real architecture, screen by screen, with your team reviewing as we go instead of receiving a black box.
The tests, CI, and standards the generator skipped go in, so the next year of features does not break what already works.
The code is yours - readable, documented, maintainable. Your team takes it from here, with no lock-in.
Before a line changes, we read the generated app end to end and answer three questions in writing: what is salvageable, what has to be rebuilt, and what it will take. That assessment is free to read and free to walk away from - it is the same first step on every rescue we run.
Neither by default. We read the generated app first and tell you, in writing, what is salvageable and what needs rebuilding - most rescues keep the product and screens and replace what is underneath. A full rewrite only happens when the assessment says that is genuinely cheaper than salvaging.
It stays where it is. The rebuild targets the code and architecture around your data, not the data itself - migrations happen only where the assessment finds a real reason, and we tell you before touching anything live.
The codebase assessment answers this directly: we read what generated the app, flag what is readable and testable as-is, and mark what has to change because it blocks the next feature. You get that judgment in writing before any rebuild starts.
That is the point of the rebuild. The result is conventional, documented Flutter on utopia_hooks - a pattern a new developer can read - not a codebase only we can extend.
It depends on how much of the generated app survives assessment, which is exactly why that assessment comes first and in writing - so you know the timeline before committing to the rebuild.
Send the repo or the FlutterFlow export as it stands. A founder reads it and replies within 24 hours - no sales call attached.
Read our case studies