We don't put GPT in your app. We use AI to build it. The agents run on a stack of skills - your project's conventions, our published Flutter skills, and specialised ones we wrote for the hard parts. They draft; a senior engineer reviews every change before it lands. The result is the Flutter your own team would have written, and you can read exactly how it was built.
The agents run a layered stack rather than improvising off a blank prompt - your project's own conventions and domain, the Flutter skills we publish and carry across every build, and specialised ones for the work that breaks generation - all on Screen · State · View, so the output stays testable and reviewable.
As the agents generate, a drift skill checks every change against your architecture and conventions - so the codebase holds its shape instead of drifting, screen by screen, into something nobody chose.
Hand it a design - including an AI-generated one - and a mapping skill turns it into structured Flutter on your design system, implemented as drawn instead of pixel-pushed by hand.
Architect, Maintainer, Reviewer, and Pre-commit Auditor: four agents, each owning a stage, running the skills and challenging each draft - so a change is critiqued and gated before a human ever sees it.
No agent commit reaches your main branch unreviewed. A senior Flutter engineer reads each one and shapes the outcome - the agents move the work forward; the calls that decide the architecture stay with people.
Before we propose anything, the agents read every screen and the state behind it, and we report - in writing - how the app is built today and what they can and cannot safely touch.
We lay down Screen · State · View on utopia_hooks so the structure is decided before code is generated - the agents write into a known architecture.
The agents run their skills on your feature - drafting, checking drift, mapping designs, critiquing each other - with a senior engineer reviewing every change that lands.
Tests, types, and CI land alongside the feature, not after it - so the next change cannot silently break the last one.
The code is conventional Flutter your team can read and extend - documented and yours, the project skills we built for you included. Nothing gated behind us, no lock-in.
Agentic Flutter development is the practice of having AI agents write production Flutter, running on a stack of skills - your conventions, our published Flutter skills, and specialised ones for the hard parts - rather than off a blank prompt. A senior Flutter engineer reviews every change before it lands, so the result is the Flutter your own team would have written.
Real code that ships - the agents draft features on your actual screens. What decides whether it's production-grade is the review gate: a senior engineer reads and shapes every change before it lands on your branch.
A senior Flutter engineer, on every single change - no agent commit reaches your main branch unreviewed. The agents move the work forward; the calls that decide the architecture stay with people.
Yes - the skills stack starts with your project's own conventions and domain, layered under the Flutter skills we publish and the specialised ones for drift and design mapping. It is not one fixed prompt applied to every codebase.
A dedicated drift skill checks every generated change against your architecture and conventions as the agents work, and the whole stack runs on Screen · State · View, so what gets written is testable and reviewable by construction.
Yes - Jolly Phonics ships on this exact loop today, and the Flutter skills the agents run on are published, so you can inspect the methodology yourself before signing anything.
Send the repo. A founder reads it and replies within 24 hours - and you can see how the agents actually work before you decide anything.
See the architecture
